首页> 外文OA文献 >Goin' Holyrood? A study of voters' online information behaviour when using parties' and candidates' websites during the 2011 Scottish Parliament election campaign.
【2h】

Goin' Holyrood? A study of voters' online information behaviour when using parties' and candidates' websites during the 2011 Scottish Parliament election campaign.

机译:去了Holyrood?对2011年苏格兰议会大选期间选民使用政党网站和候选人网站的在线信息行为的研究。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper reports the results of a study of voters' online behaviour conducted during the 2011 Scottish Parliamentary election campaign. Here, 64 citizens of Aberdeen, North-east Scotland, were observed and questioned while they searched for, browsed and used information on the websites of political parties and candidates standing for election to the Scottish Parliament. While online campaign sites were generally regarded as serving a useful purpose, as being easy to use and understand, relatively interesting and likely to be visited again, there was very little evidence in this study to indicate that they had any significant impact on voting behaviour during the 2011 Scottish campaign. Rather, the participants' comments suggest that more traditional information sources, particularly print and broadcast media, coupled with long-established campaign techniques, such as leaflet deliveries and door knocking, continue to be more influential in determining voters' democratic choices.
机译:本文报告了在2011年苏格兰议会选举期间进行的选民在线行为研究的结果。在这里,苏格兰东北部阿伯丁的64位公民在搜寻,浏览和使用政党网站和准备当选苏格兰议会的候选人的网站上的信息时受到观察和询问。尽管在线竞选网站通常被认为是有用的目的,因为它易于使用和理解,相对有趣并且很可能会再次被访问,但本研究中几乎没有证据表明它们对选举期间的投票行为有重大影响。 2011年的苏格兰战役。相反,与会者的意见表明,更多传统的信息来源,特别是印刷和广播媒体,再加上诸如传单分发和敲门之类的悠久的竞选技术,在确定选民的民主选择方面继续发挥更大的影响力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号